Julius Caesar Scaliger: Exotericarum exercitationum liber quintus decimusAbbildungenDeskriptionJ. C. ScaligerMichel de VascosanVerweise

We are astonished at the encyclopedic wealth of knowledge which the ‘Exercitationes’ display

Julius Caesar Scaliger:

IVLII CAESARIS | SCALIGERI | EXOTERICARVM EXERCITATIONVM | LIBER | QVINTVS DECIMVS, | DE | SVBTILITATE, | AD | HIERONYMVM CARDANVM. || In extremo duo ſunt indices: prior breuiuſculus, conti-|nens ſententias nobiliores: alter opulentiſsi-|mus, penè omnia complectens.

Paris: Michel de Vascosan, 1557.

Quarto. 235 × 161 mm. [4], 476, [31], [1]w. Bll. – Lagensignaturen: *4, a-z4, aa-zz4, A-Z4, AA-ZZ4, Aa-Zz4, Aaa-Mmm4. (Foll. Mmm3 verso & Mmm4 weiß). Mit 19 teils schematischen Holzschnitten im Text.

Dunkelbraunes französisches Kalbleder der Zeit auf fünf Doppelbünden und Pappdeckeln, Reste einer goldgeprägten Titelei auf zweitem Feld, die anderen mit einem kleinen Mittelornament. Die Deckel mit vergoldetem Randrahmen aus zwei Linien, großem ovalem Mittelstück mit Arabesken und Bandwerk auf schraffiertem Goldgrund und ebensolchen großen Eckornamenten. Goldschnitt.

Erste Ausgabe des bedeutenden Werk gegen des Cardanus ‚De subtilitate’: Scaliger (Giulio Bordone della Scala, 1484-1558) zeigt darin die vermeintlichen Irrtümer seines Vorgängers auf und entwickelt darüberhinaus positiv Theorien über verschiedene naturwissenschaftliche Fragestellungen, wie auch über Projektion und Ballistik. Durch seinen Umfang und die Breite abgehandelter Themen ist das vorliegende Werk eine Enzyklopädie der Naturwissenschaften, die den Stand des damaligen Wissens aufzeigt. „A wholesome effect was perhaps exercised by some of Scaliger’s criticisms of Cardan“ (Thorndike VI,283 f. & VI,293 mit einigen Beispielen; cf. Ian MacLean: „The Interpretation of Natural Signs: Cardano’s ‚De subtilitate’ Versus Scaliger’s ‚Exercitationes’.“ In „Occult and Scientific Mentalities in the Renaissance“. Edited by Brian Vickers. Cambridge, UK, 1984. pp. 231-252). Exercitatio CCCXXVII „Quaedam de subtilioribus artibus, magia, notoria, alchymia, ziferis“ behandelt auch die Kryptologie. Scaliger lebte als Arzt in Venedig und Padua und zog erst 1529 nach Agen in Frankreich. Cf. Contemporaries of Erasmus III,212-214. Schöner Antiqua-Druck mit zahlreichen Passagen in Griechisch.

Rücken unter Verwendung des alten Materials restauriert, zwei Ecken restauriert, Einband teils berieben, Hinterdeckel etwas fleckig. Titel mit gelöschtem Vermerk, innen papierbedingt leicht gebräunt, wenige Blatt etwas gebräunt, schmaler Wasserand im unteren weißen Rand, in roter Tinte regliert. Mit dem meist fehlenden, letzten weißen Blatt.

Adams S579 – Durling 4091 – Bird 2141 – BM STC 396 – Caillet III,9947 – Rosenthal 211 – Galland 161 – Ebert 20449 – Graesse VI,289 – Poggendorf II,765 – Duveen Suppl. 342. Cf. Ferguson: Chemica II,324 (Ausg. 1582) & Krivatsy – Bibliographien.
Die Textabbildungen sind bearbeitet und geben nicht den originalen Zustand wieder.


Julius Caesar Scaliger

Julius Caesar Scaliger (1484–1558), so distinguished by his learning and talents that, according to A. de Thou, no one of the ancients could be placed above him and the age in which he lived could not show his equal, was, according to his own account, a scion of the house of La Scala, for a hundred and fifty years princes of Verona, and was born in 1484 at-the castle of La Rocca on the Lago de Garda. At the age of twelve his kinsman the emperor Maximilian placed him among his pages. He remained for seventeen years in the service of the emperor, distinguishing himself as a soldier and as a captain. But he was unmindful neither of letters, in which he had the most eminent scholars of the day as his instructors, nor of art, which he studied with considerable success under Albrecht Dürer. In 1512 at the battle of Ravenna, where his father and elder brother were killed, he displayed prodigies of valour, and received the highest honours of chivalry from his imperial cousin, who conferred upon him with his own hands the spurs, the collar and the eagle of gold. But this was the only reward he obtained. He left the service of Maximilian, and after a brief employment by another kinsman, the duke of Ferrara, he decided to quit the military life, and in 1514 entered as a student at the university of Bologna. He determined to take holy orders, in the expectation that he would become cardinal, and then pope, when he would wrest from the Venetians his principality of Verona, of which the republic had despoiled his ancestors. But, though he soon gave up this design, he remained at the university until 1519. The next six years he passed at the castle of Vico Nuovo, in Piedmont, as a guest of the family of La Rovére, at first dividing his time between military expeditions in the summer, and study, chiefly of medicine and natural history, in the winter, until a severe attack of rheumatic gout brought his military career to a close. Henceforth his life was wholly devoted to study. In 1525 he accompanied M. A. de la Rovére, bishop of Agen, to that city as his physician. Such is the outline of his own account of his early life. It was not until some time after his death that the enemies of his son first alleged that he was not of the family of La Scala, but was the son of Benedetto Bordone, an illuminator or schoolmaster of Verona; that he was educated at Padua, where he took the degree of M.D.; and that his story of his life and adventures before arriving at Agen was a tissue of fables. It certainly is supported by no other evidence than his own statements, some of which are inconsistent with well-ascertained facts (see below ad fin.).

The remaining thirty-two years of his life were passed almost wholly at Agen, in the full light of contemporary history. They were without adventure, almost without incident, but it was in them that he achieved so much distinction that at his death in 1558 he had the highest scientific and literary reputation of any man in Europe. A few days after his arrival at Agen he fell in love with a charming orphan of thirteen, Andiette de Roques Lobejac. Her friends objected to her marriage with an unknown adventurer, but in 1528 he had obtained so much success as a physician that the objections of her family were overcome, and at forty-five he married Andiette, who was then sixteen. The marriage proved a complete success; it was followed by twenty nine years of almost uninterrupted happiness, and by the birth of fifteen children.

A charge of heresy in 1538, of which he was acquitted by his friendly judges, one of whom was his friend Arnoul Le Ferron, was almost the only event of interest during these years, except the publication of his books, and the quarrels and criticisms to which they gave rise. In 1531 he printed his first oration against Erasmus, in defence of Cicero and the Ciceronians. It is a piece of vigorous invective, displaying, like all his subsequent writings, an astonishing command of Latin, and much brilliant rhetoric, but full of vulgar abuse, and completely missing the point of the Ciceronianus of Erasmus. The writer’s indignation at finding it treated with silent contempt by the great scholar, who though tit was the work of a personal enemy—Aleander—caused him to write a second oration, more violent, more abusive, with more self-glorification, but with less real merit than the first. The orations were followed by a prodigious quantity of Latin verse, which appeared in successive volumes in 1533, 1534, 1539, 1546 and 1547; of these, a friendly critic, Mark Pattison, is obliged to approve the judgment of Huet, who says, "par ses poésies brutes et informes Scaliger a déshonoré le Parnasse"; yet their numerous editions show that they commended themselves not only to his contemporaries, but to succeeding scholars. A brief tract on comic metres (De comicis dimensionibus) and a work De causis linguae Latinas—the earliest Latin grammar on scientific principles and following a scientific method—were his only other purely literary works published in his lifetime. His Poetice appeared in 1561 after his death. With many paradoxes, with many criticisms which are below contempt, and many indecent displays of personal animosity especially in his reference to Étienne Dolet, over whose death he gloated with brutal malignity—it yet contains acute criticism, and showed for the first time what such a treatise ought to be, and how it ought to be written.

But it is as a philosopher and a man of science that J. C. Scaliger ought to be judged. Classical studies he regarded as an agreeable relaxation from severer pursuits. Whatever the truth or fable of the first forty years of his life, he had certainly been a close and accurate observer, and had made himself acquainted with many curious and little-known phenomena, which he had stored up in a most tenacious memory. His scientific writings are all in the form of commentaries, and it was not until his seventieth year that (with the exception of a brief tract on the De insomniis of Hippocrates) he felt that any of them were sufficiently complete to be given to the world. In 1556 he printed his Dialogue on the De plantis attributed to Aristotle, and in 1557 his Exercitationes on the work of Jerome Cardan, De subtilitate. His other scientific works, Commentaries on Theophrastus’ De causis plantarum and Aristotle’s History of Animals, he left in a more or less unfinished state, and they were not printed until after his death. They are all marked by arrogant dogmatism, violence of language, a constant tendency to self glorification, strangely combined with extensive real knowledge, with acute reasoning, with an observation of facts and details almost unparalleled. But he is only the naturalist of his own time. That he anticipated in any manner the inductive philosophy cannot be contended; his botanical studies did not lead him, like his contemporary Konrad von Gesner, to any idea of a ​natural system of classification, and he rejected with the utmost arrogance and violence of language the discoveries of Copernicus. In metaphysics and in natural history Aristotle was a law to him, and in medicine Galen, but he was not a slave to the text or the details of either. He has thoroughly mastered their principles, and is able to see when his masters are not true to themselves. He corrects Aristotle by himself. He is in that stage of learning when the attempt is made to harmonize the written word with the actual facts of nature, and the result is that his works have no real scientific value. Their interest is only historical. His Exercitationes upon the De subtilitate of Cardan (1557) is the book by which Scaliger is best known as a philosopher. Its numerous editions bear witness to its popularity, and until the final fall of Aristotle’s physics it continued a popular textbook. We are astonished at the encyclopedic wealth of knowledge which the Exercitationes display, at the vigour of the author’s style, at the accuracy of his observations, but are obliged to agree with G. Naudé that he has committed more faults than he has discovered in Cardan, and with Charles Nisard that his object seems to be to deny all that Cardan affirms and to affirm all that Cardan denies. Yet Leibnitz and Sir William Hamilton recognize him as the best modern exponent of the physics and metaphysics of Aristotle. He died at Agen on the 21st of October 1558. — Encyclopædia Britannica, Eleventh Edition, Cambridge: University Press, 1911. Vol. XXIV, pp. 283-284.


Michel de Vascosan

Michel de Vascosan (um 1500 in Amiens – 1577 zu Paris), ein französischer Buchhändler und Drucker von vermutlich italienischer Herkunft, heiratete Catherine, Tochter des Pariser Druckers Josse Bade (Jodocus Badius), des Schwiegervaters von Fédéric Morel und Robert Estienne. Von 1532 bis 1577 betätigte er sich in Paris als Drucker, übernahm 1535 nach dessen Tod die Werkstatt von Bade, wurde später Drucker an der Universität von Paris und von 1560 bis 1576 königlicher Drucker für griechische Texte. Neben Hunderten von Ausgaben griechischer wie lateinischer Klassiker erscheinen in seinen Katalogen auch die Namen berühmter Zeitgenossen wie Budé, Bourbon, Macrin, Scaliger, Péleder von Mans, Ronsard, Du Bellay, Amyot, Le Roy, Vigenère, die er oftmals als erster herausgab. Um 1540 wandte er sich französischen Texten und deren Illustration zu. So förderte er die kulturelle wie intellektuelle Entwicklung seines Landes, indem er ab 1550 ein umfangreiches Programm von Übersetzungen wichtiger Werke der klassischen Antike ins Französische, aber auch von Texten in einheimischer Sprache publizierte. Als einer der ersten wandte er sich gegen gotische Drucktypen.

„Allein, ist es nicht wahr, daß wir bey der Anführung mehr auf die Ehre, als auf die Wahrheit unsers Vortrags sehen? Wir glauben also, es sey mehr, wenn wir unsere Beweise aus des Vascosan oder Plantins Läden entlehnen, als wenn wir sie aus unserm Dorfe hernehmen: oder, wir haben vielmehr nicht Scharfsinnigkeit genug, das, was vor unsern Augen vorgehet, zu entwickeln, und heraus zu putzen. Es schickt sich nicht, daß wir sagen, wir hätten nicht so viel Ansehen, als, unser Zeugniß glaubwürdig zu machen nöthig wäre: denn, meines Erachtens könnten aus den gewöhnlichsten, gemeinsten, und bekanntesten Dingen, wenn wir sie recht in Licht zu setzen wüßten, die größten Wunder der Natur und die herrlichsten Beyspiele, ins besondere in Ansehung der menschlichen Handlungen, werden.“ — Michel de Montaigne: Versuche nebst des Verfassers Leben nach der neuesten Ausgabe des Herrn Peter Coste ins Deutsche übersetzt. III,xiii. Übersetzt von Johann Daniel Tietz. Leipzig: Friedrich Lankischens Erben, 1753/1754.

Des presses humanistes au service du vernaculaire? Le cas Vascosan (vers 1500-1577)